Trial·Breaker
Home › Advocacy › Examination-in-chief

Examination-in-chief

Examination-in-chief is the questioning of a witness by the party who called them. Its job is to bring out the witness's evidence in their own words, clearly and in order.

The rules

Technique

  1. Open questions that still steer: who, what, where, when, how — "What happened next?", "Where were you standing?".
  2. Headline each topic so the court knows where you are going: "I want to ask you now about the payment run."
  3. Slow down on the key moment. One small question at a time lets the witness paint the scene.
  4. Deal with weaknesses yourself before the other side does it for you in cross-examination.

Practise it

The examination-in-chief drill in our advocacy trainer gives you your own witness and an opponent who objects the moment you lead on something in dispute.

Questions

Why can't you lead in examination-in-chief?

Because the evidence must come from the witness, not from counsel. A leading question suggests the answer and reduces the weight of what the witness says.

What is the difference between examination-in-chief and re-examination?

Examination-in-chief comes first and covers the witness's evidence; re-examination comes after cross-examination and is limited to matters arising from it.

Exam rules, fees and dates come from the SRA and change over time — sqe.sra.org.uk is authoritative. Last reviewed October 2026.

Try the advocacy trainer