Trial·Breaker SQE1
SQE1 › FLK2 › Trusts
SQE1 · FLK2

Trusts — SQE1 practice questions

Express trusts and the three certainties, constitution and formalities, resulting and constructive trusts, trustees' duties and powers, breach of trust, fiduciary duties and tracing.

Practise 25 Trusts questions free

3 free questions with answers

The three certainties

Margaret died last year. Clause 4 of her will leaves her residuary estate, worth about £350,000, 'to my son Dominic, in the full confidence that he will do what is right and fair by my grandchildren'. Nothing else in the will refers to the grandchildren. Dominic has told his three nieces that he intends to keep the whole residue for himself. The nieces have asked whether they can compel him to share it with them.

Which of the following best describes the effect of clause 4?

  1. ADominic holds the residue on a fixed trust for the grandchildren in equal shares, because a testator's expressed wishes bind the person to whom the gift is made.
  2. BDominic takes the residue absolutely, because words expressing confidence or hope do not show the certainty of intention needed to impose a trust.
  3. CDominic holds the residue on a discretionary trust for the grandchildren, because the class of grandchildren is conceptually certain.
  4. DDominic holds the residue on a resulting trust for Margaret's estate, because the gift fails for uncertainty of subject matter.
  5. EDominic takes the residue absolutely only if the grandchildren cannot be listed completely, because otherwise a fixed trust arises.
Show answer and reasoning
B is the best answer. A trust arises only where the words, construed as a whole, show an intention to impose a binding obligation. Precatory words such as 'in full confidence that' are, without more, treated as a moral expectation rather than a trust obligation (Re Adams and the Kensington Vestry). Dominic therefore takes an absolute gift.

Rule: Precatory words expressing hope, wish or confidence do not, without more, show the certainty of intention required to create a trust, so the donee takes absolutely.

  • A Since the nineteenth century the courts have refused to treat precatory words as automatically creating a trust; the intention to impose an obligation must be shown. (wrong rule)
  • C Certainty of objects is irrelevant where there is no certainty of intention to create a trust in the first place. (answers a different question)
  • D The subject matter, the residuary estate, is certain; the defect is the lack of intention to create a trust. (right rule, wrong facts)
  • E Whether a complete list of objects can be drawn up does not matter when the words show no intention to create any trust. (answers a different question)

Source: Re Adams and the Kensington Vestry (1884) 27 Ch D 394; Knight v Knight (1840) 3 Beav 148

The three certainties

Owen owns 1,000 ordinary shares in Calder Engineering Ltd, all of the same class and registered in his name. In a signed letter to his niece Priya he wrote: 'I now declare that I hold 100 of my Calder shares on trust for you absolutely.' Owen did not identify which 100 shares he meant and did nothing to separate them from the others. Two years later Owen was made bankrupt, and his trustee in bankruptcy claims all 1,000 shares for his creditors.

Which of the following best describes Priya's position?

  1. APriya has no proprietary claim, because a trust of part of a larger holding fails unless the part has been segregated from the rest.
  2. BPriya has no proprietary claim, because a gift of shares is incomplete until the shares are registered in the donee's name.
  3. CPriya has only a personal claim against Owen's bankrupt estate, because a declaration of trust must be supported by consideration.
  4. DPriya is entitled to 100 of the shares, because a declaration of trust of identical intangible shares is valid without segregation.
  5. EPriya is entitled to 100 of the shares only if the declaration was made by deed.
Show answer and reasoning
D is the best answer. Where the subject matter is a number of identical shares of one class in a single company, the Court of Appeal has held that a trust of part of the holding is valid without segregation, because it does not matter which shares are held on trust (Hunter v Moss). The segregation requirement in Re London Wine Co applies to tangible goods. Owen's self-declaration was complete, so the 100 shares do not form part of his estate for his creditors.

Rule: A declaration of trust over part of a holding of identical shares of one class is sufficiently certain without segregation, unlike a trust of part of a bulk of tangible goods.

  • A The requirement for segregation applies to tangible chattels (Re London Wine Co); it does not apply to identical intangible shares (Hunter v Moss). (right rule, wrong facts)
  • B Registration matters only for a transfer of legal title; Owen declared himself trustee, which needs no transfer. (answers a different question)
  • C Equity will not assist a volunteer to perfect an incomplete gift, but a completed declaration of trust is binding without consideration. (wrong rule)
  • E A declaration of trust of personalty such as shares needs no formality at all, still less a deed. (wrong rule)

Source: Hunter v Moss [1994] 1 WLR 452; Re London Wine Co (Shippers) Ltd [1986] PCC 121

The three certainties

Harold ran a bakery in Leeds for 40 years before retiring. He transferred £300,000 to two trustees 'to be divided equally among all persons who have at any time worked at my Leeds bakery'. The bakery's payroll records were destroyed in a flood some years ago, and the trustees cannot identify everyone who worked there. They have so far traced 85 former staff.

Which of the following best describes the validity of the trust?

  1. AThe trust fails, because a fixed trust is valid only if a complete list of the beneficiaries can be drawn up.
  2. BThe trust is valid, because it is enough that the trustees can say of any given person whether he or she is or is not within the class.
  3. CThe trust is valid, and the trustees may divide the fund equally among the 85 former staff they have traced.
  4. DThe trust fails, because the phrase 'worked at my Leeds bakery' is conceptually uncertain.
  5. EThe trust is valid, and the court will direct a cy-près scheme for the fund.
Show answer and reasoning
A is the best answer. A gift 'equally among' a class is a fixed trust, and each beneficiary's share depends on the total number of beneficiaries. A fixed trust therefore requires that a complete list of the objects can be compiled (IRC v Broadway Cottages Trust). As the records are lost and the class cannot be completely ascertained, the trust fails.

Rule: A fixed trust is valid only if a complete list of all the beneficiaries can be drawn up.

  • B The 'is or is not' test applies to discretionary trusts (McPhail v Doulton), not to a fixed trust for equal division. (wrong rule)
  • C Dividing among only those found would defeat the shares of untraced beneficiaries, so a complete list is required. (wrong rule)
  • D Working at a particular bakery is conceptually clear; the problem is evidential, which is fatal for a fixed trust. (right rule, wrong facts)
  • E Cy-près applies to charitable trusts; this is a private trust for a class of individuals. (wrong rule)

Source: IRC v Broadway Cottages Trust [1955] Ch 20; McPhail v Doulton [1971] AC 424

Next 20 questions on Trusts →

Subtopics

Breach of trust and tracing3 questions
Charitable and purpose trusts3 questions
Constitution and formalities4 questions
Resulting and constructive trusts4 questions
The three certainties4 questions
Trustees' duties and powers5 questions
Trusts of the family home2 questions

More FLK2 topics