Trial·Breaker SQE1
SQE1 › FLK1 › Business Law and Practice › Question
SQE1 · FLK1 · Business Law and Practice

Company formation and constitution — SQE1 BLP question

A worked single-best-answer question on company formation and constitution, with why each wrong option is wrong — the way SQE1 traps candidates.

Company formation and constitution

The articles of Hartley Tools Ltd provide that the directors must not enter into any contract worth more than £50,000 without the prior approval of the members by ordinary resolution. The board resolves to buy machinery for £80,000 from Ostler Supplies Ltd and the managing director signs the contract on the company's behalf. No members' approval is sought. Ostler's sales director had read Hartley's articles on the public register and knew of the restriction, but acted honestly throughout. Hartley Tools Ltd now wants to avoid the contract.

Can Hartley Tools Ltd avoid the contract with Ostler Supplies Ltd?

  1. AYes, because a contract made in breach of the articles is outside the company's capacity and is void.
  2. BYes, because Ostler knew of the restriction in the articles and so did not deal with the company in good faith.
  3. CYes, because Ostler is deemed to have notice of the contents of the articles filed at Companies House.
  4. DNo, because the directors' power to bind the company is deemed free of constitutional limitations in favour of a person dealing in good faith, and mere knowledge of the limitation is not bad faith.
  5. ENo, but the contract will only bind the company once the members ratify it by special resolution.
Show answer and reasoning
D is the best answer. Section 40(1) Companies Act 2006 provides that, in favour of a person dealing with a company in good faith, the power of the directors to bind the company, or authorise others to do so, is deemed free of any limitation under the constitution. A person is presumed to act in good faith and is not regarded as acting in bad faith by reason only of knowing that an act is beyond the directors' powers (s 40(2)(b)(iii)). The contract therefore binds Hartley; the directors may, however, be liable to the company for exceeding their powers.

Rule: In favour of a person dealing in good faith, the directors' power to bind the company is deemed free of constitutional limitations, and knowledge of the limitation alone is not bad faith (CA 2006 s 40).

  • A A company's capacity is not limited by anything in its constitution (s 39); this is a limit on the directors' authority, not capacity. (wrong rule)
  • B Knowledge that the act exceeds the directors' powers is not, by itself, bad faith (s 40(2)(b)(iii)). (wrong rule)
  • C A person dealing with a company is not bound to enquire into limits on the directors' powers (s 40(2)(b)(i)); constructive notice does not apply. (wrong rule)
  • E The contract binds the company already under s 40; no ratification by special resolution is required. (wrong rule)

Source: Companies Act 2006, ss 39, 40(1)-(2)

Practise more Business Law and Practice   All BLP subtopics